Comments that have stopped appearing on YouTube since this tracker first recorded them.
Deleting a top-level comment (0 so far) takes every reply beneath it out of view, so one removal can account for dozens. Re-checking the flags against the API found them matching. Every flag is pulled back from the API one at a time to check: 10 confirmed deleted, 0 still there. Open Deletions at the top of the page for the split and what removed them.10comments gone10 confirmed deleted0 went with 0 whole threads10 went on their own
18 threads
Creator comments per hour
Thread with deleted comments1 deleted7 replies in thread
It’s kind of a tell that you are willing to debate so called “charlatans” when it comes to flat earth, covid conspiracies etc. but not on this topic? Nothing held you back of debating charlatans ever, but here you don’t want debate? Are you sure you’re not a bit afraid?
What? That all the genocide scholars on earth are wrong because the pest laughs at Palestinians getting sniped. Wow man imagine if all scholarly research was done like this. Instead of listening to the doctor explain the bullets found in toddlers skulls. Let's watch an argument between an uneducated sex pest who argues in bad faith. Brilliant!!
"Genercide scholars wrong because won't debate epsteiny hurrr, muh debate!!"
I could debate destiny and beat him in a single sentence but him and his fans, who are cult members for a pedophile won't accept it.
One sentence: East Timor and Srbrenica are legal genocides recognized the world over, their motives were the same as Israel, they didn't kill everybody, infact the death toll in those two genocides are less than the Gaza genocide.
You could explain thia to them a million times and the epateiny people will keep denying it even if it qas in debate format. You people are juat loaers who wants to see your aexpest make funny noises and faces while ignoring genocide scholars. No aurprise epsteiny doesn't know about Srbrenica or East Timor. He learned where Palestine and Israel were like 3 ywars ago. Lmao.
0 likesgone from YouTube · noticed 04 Oct 2026, 20:09
6 other comments in this thread are not shown
Thread with deleted comments1 deleted3 replies in thread
Dave knows none of this Ai generated virtue signalling bullshit is going to hold up in a one on one debate which is why he'll keep being a pussy about debating Destiny, despite him being so debate hungry when it comes to easy targets like flat earthers.
On Destiny's side for sure, just being sarcastic and asking silly questions.
Eric showed reports and pictures. Dave also, plus videos and interviews.
It was a pretty lame "debate", we probably agree on that
Here's one fact: Destiny said there where still hostages. All hostages have been released from Gaza. Can you engage with why your favorite solicitor of CSAM was lying here?
@ttom1957 sorry, i didn't know you're utterly uninformed about world events. I agree with you, you shouldn't debate anyone, letting them be pro or antigenocide.
Just keep pretending you're a tough boy on the internet. That's very cool too
Can someone name the website that shows all of Israel's atrocities in Gaza against the Palestinian people? Dave has mentioned it in his videos a few times but I can't remember it and having a hard time finding it.
Ten of thousands of dead children and the complete flattening of the palestinains home is not a genocide?
I cannot tell if this is sheer stupidity or a piss poor attempt at misinformation
If you have watched Dave's videos and are still unclear, then you are not a person, you are a bot. You can even watch Destiny being obviously bad faith afterwards. It's painfully obvious and I wish I would've looked into this sooner. Their goal of making it seem too complicated for me to bother looking into seemed to work though. Which is another thing that is obvious: If they are so right, and there are all these "hamas terrorists" running around gaza, THEN WHY DO THEY WANT TO SUPPRESS PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT THIS? I know when I'm right, I want everyone I can to come look at all the obvious reasons I'm right... Israel thinks of ways to keep people from looking into it though! If they were in the right they'd be doing the opposite.... Anyone that is being objective and has enough braincells to not just be a fanboy of internet people can see this clear as day.
I can only watch your videos on Destiny when my partner isn't home because it enrages him that you've made these videos. I will never understand why he loves this man so much. Please never stop fighting him, he's basically the Tucker Carlson of the left and doesn't deserve his platform.
Do you mean to say he supports destiny? Im confused. Edit: looks like he does support destiny. There's not many opinions I'd say you need to leave your partner for, but this is definitely one of them. Run away.
If he's mad that one of his favorite creator is being called out, he is genuinely emotionally unstable. I won't tell you to get out since I don't know you personally, but keep that in mind if he ever acts out.
He kind of has a point tho no? If Israel was truly trying to maximize death, why give warnings before they bomb places? Planet Peterson didn’t contest this either.
4 likesgone from YouTube · noticed 04 Oct 2026, 18:29
@[name withheld]
"If I wanted to rob someone, why didn't I take all of their stuff rather than just the most valuable things? Isn't that weird"
That is horrendous logic. Just because someone didn't do it as bad as they could have, doesn't mean they aren't doing the bad thing.
@spookyscarylamppost3431 that’s a false dichotomy. You are comparing apples to oranges. Robbery and attempts to commit genocide are two different things. The reason why I said he might have a point is because in order to commit genocide, there has to be genuine intent to destroy a nation, an ethnic religion, race, or peoples. If Israel is giving warnings before they bomb, that shows me there is no intention in destroy an ethnic religion, race or peoples.
0 likesgone from YouTube · noticed 04 Oct 2026, 18:29
@[name withheld]
Oh ok, so if they gave a warning that they want to bulldoze Gaza so they can build whatever they want, that's not "intent to destroy a religion, population or nation" as you've said?
What about all those others bombings they gave no warning abouts? Especially on the UN-run schools and facilities? They gave warnings a couple time, so that abosolve them of the ones they gave no warnings for?
My examples was to show Destiny's flaw. Just because someone could do it worse, doesn't make the bad suddenly acceptable. The fact you call it False Dichotomy without proving me wrong other than missing the point shows where your bias is.
@spookyscarylamppost3431 If you could do worse then there is no genocide. You could argue that them not doing the absolute worse shows that they have no intent to actually genocide. Determining weather or not a genocide is happening between two waring nations is really really hard. Since both sides have the excuse of military operations. Same goes for Russia-Ukraine. there is an actual argument to be made that both sides are genociding each other. but until there is a consensus for either of them. I don't see a genocide. If there is a consensus and it says that Israel is doing a genocide, then I will admit I was wrong and I will change my approach.
0 likesgone from YouTube · noticed 04 Oct 2026, 18:29
what do I say to those who claim 20% of the Israeli population is Arab Muslim and if Israel was conducting genocide, they would start with those 20% already in Israel?
They're ethnically cleansing Gaza to keep it. It's territorial expansion. They don't need to kill second class citizens in the territory they already control.
Because they already rule over them? There's hardly ever a benefit to killing your own citizens, it's also much harder to justify, because the people you need to stay in power may be friends with the people you're murdering.
I dont believe israel knew about and let october ith hapoen. I think they caused the hate that lead up to it and used the event as a springboard for public opinion to allow their invasion of gaza. That is bad enough without me adding speculations.
Can't wait for another wave of Destiny's cult to cry over this video they don't have the balls to watch. Quick question Dave, I know you've touched a bit on this on some of your previous videos but if by some weird occurrence Joe Rogan hasn't seen your content demolishing him and only thinks you're that flat earth debunker and ends up inviting you on his show kinda like Flint Dibble to debunk something, would you go ? Thanks !
@ProfessorDaveExplains there are more to come?! I've only seen one thumbnail passing by. Still collecting courage to start this new subject on your channel. I hope you're doing well sir!
I'm no fan of Destiny, like not by any stretch of the imagination, but dude come on. You entitle this video "This is what bad faith debate looks like" and then talk about "if he touched a woman's chest like he did to Hasan he'd be canceled. This is sexual assault what he just did." You're using a hypothetical situation to say "this is assault." You're seriously going to say you've never put your hands on a male friend, colleague, or family member in a manner or way that you wouldn't do to or with a female exactly because it IS a guy and you have that understanding with them?
This really strikes me as bad faith.
It's not a "hypothetical situation" you dumb piece of shit. He sexually assaulted Hasan. Repeatedly. No, I have never touched another human like that dozens of times while they repeatedly and emphatically told me to stop. That's what sexual predators do. Go fuck yourself.
Okay. Sure. A little cheeky titty-grabbing with the boys as a joke is fine. Friends interact differently than strangers.
But if your friend pushes your hand off him more than once and literally says 'stop', you... would lay off, right?
53:48 During WW2 There were instances where Polish underground fighters took german hostages and there were talks of exchanging them for fighters held by the enemy. I guess what Germans did was not a genocide, guys. Per Destiny.
He's dismissing any rational argument by saying that that's somehow the only argument. The argument is about dolus specialis itself AND the fact the ICC hasn't ruled on it. Not just that the ICC hasn't ruled on it dumbass
1 likegone from YouTube · noticed 04 Oct 2026, 18:29
Dave as an old Destiny viewer from way back, just stop covering him. He thrives off of reaction videos to videos like this, it only helps tighten his grip on his echochamber of fans. He doesn't deserve the coverage, he's just another tired drama streamer. I'm really glad I stopped following his type of pol drama slop channels years ago, I hope you don't become just another one of those channels. Focus on debunking people that are in actual positions of power.
Again, this is destiny's entire mo. Rile up another politics community to generate attention and notoriety. He has no actual political influence its all terminally online bs. All his attempts to do serious politics have backfired spectacularly. Let him scream into the void with an ever dwindling fanbase and don't feed into the same system of drama farming he has. Dave should focus on actual people of importance, not political streamer drama. If and when Dman becomes actually relevant then by all means do more of these.
It's important though. So many people have specifically commented and emailed me to say that they had no idea he was like this, and they unsubscribed from him because of my content. It helps erode his influence and limit his access to opportunities.
@ProfessorDaveExplains I get it, I'm just saying that its what he's always done. Its how he attracts new followers. I fell for it too tbh, back when I felt he actually had a coherent political outlook and was shitting on all the right people.
The concern trolling over a genocide is one of the most disgusting things I've even seen in this life. Destiny deserves the day he advocates for others.
You are a moron and the other guy is an actual example of a vile person. You can't engage so you just attack the character and the other guy is a moron who legitimizes it vy calling his takes 'depraved' while acting all high and mighty. Mr moron and mr evil perfect pair@sebidotorg
0 likesgone from YouTube · noticed 04 Oct 2026, 18:29
I think Destiny represents true atheism while Dave is diverting away ---- If there's no objective Truth then how genocide is wrong according to atheist if it serves certain elite or certain group against another group? It's like a lion attacking a zebra for atheism
@ProfessorDaveExplains The reality is that you can't against if AIPAC pays you cz there's no inherently wrong for atheism much like what Destiny is doing now
What are you talking about lol, did you have a stroke or something? Let me ask you a bad faith question, if the theists know that genocide is bad, why do they keep committing it?
On his note on people being genocided "not taking hostages." I'd point out that Jewish resistance groups didn't normally take hostages/prisoners. They generally just killed Nazis on the spot. It is also extremely unlikely the Nazis would have engaged in hostage negotiations with Jews anyways. Just like Israelis don't want to today.
@CiaphasCainHeroOfTheImperium im asking because im genuinely wondering what the comment section will say. Whether they are reasonable or not. Im not here just to hear what i want, just as you have clearly admitted to doing.
@Nuffsed81 Well, seeing as you could do your own research and figure out phase one of the answer to your question includes the stopping of the "settling" on the graves of thousands upon thousands of innocent people (a thing actively happening now), your attempt to present yourself as "just asking questions" when you were mocked by Dave kinda exposes that your original post's construction gave you that cowardly way out of any accountability for your endeavor to debate bro the issue.
So, what do you want us to say?
@Nuffsed81 Throw the israelians out, they never needed an extremely disputed land area. Just give them a random island in the middle of buttfuck nowhere like the falklands. But ooh they can't do imperialism and genocide from there, can they?
@zbrannigan yiu sound like a sycophant for dave, like peole arw with Trump. Dave mocked me oh no! Pretty childish when im o my asking a genuine good faith question out of curiosity. You dont even know where i stand on this subject yet i get cult a pdf file, an epstein cult liver etc. Im the open minded one asking qiestions willing to learn, not just here to hear an echo from what seem by the followers (not daves fault) like a childish cult.
@Tarjamat_fekria I agree they should not have the land but it's gi e past that. Youbthibkjof isreal so called government made a deal to give the land back anything would change. The Jews would have it, they would never give anything back so. Therfore it's not a viable solution, its a dream but not a solution.
@animashups9646 maybe read what I'm rwsponding to first, before ripping your mouth open to cry.
0 likesgone from YouTube · noticed 04 Oct 2026, 18:29
15 other comments in this thread are not shown
DeletionsEvery flag checked against the YouTube API, every 4 hours.
Last run 04 Oct 2026, 20:10.
10flagged by the tracker
10confirmed deleted
5separate actions
Two different numbers, and only one of them is deletions.Flagged means a comment stopped appearing in the listing , all this
tracker can see by itself, and it over-reports badly: a reply under a removed top-level
comment gets hidden, not removed, and still answers the API when asked for by id.
Confirmed means it was asked for by id and came back empty. Count
deletions off the confirmed number; the flagged one is a starting point, not a finding.
Reading the chart below
It counts occasions , one account, or one wiped
thread, losing comments in one scan , not comments. That total is not meant to match the
confirmed count above, nor the separate actions figure, which counts something
narrower again.
How long comments lasted cannot be answered on this video.
Tracking started after the video was published, so only 2 of the 10
confirmed removals are comments watched from the moment they were posted. For the other
8 the age at removal is a floor rather than a measurement, and a distribution
drawn from what is left would describe when this tracker was switched on rather than
anything YouTube did. The chart is withheld for that reason.
When removals were spotted, against when the comments were postedOne dot is one occasion, not one comment , a wiped thread
is a single dot, sized by how many comments it took. Across: when this tracker first
found them gone. Up: when those comments were originally posted, from YouTube's own
timestamp. Both axes are dates. A dot near the diagonal went soon after it was
written; a tall spread at one moment took comments of several vintages at once.
Whole thread went
0 comments in 0 dotsOne account, across more than one thread
4 comments in 1 dotsNo shared pattern
6 comments in 3 dots
Read the across axis carefully. It is when this tracker
noticed, not when it happened. Scanning runs on a timer, so everything found in
one pass carries the same timestamp. These 10 removals were spread over
8 distinct moments, and the busiest single pass accounts for 3 of
them. Removals closer together than one scan cannot be told apart, and a vertical line
of dots is scan batching , not evidence that anything happened at the same instant.
The shaded band is everything posted before tracking began: a dot in there was
already old when this tracker first saw it, so its height is real but its distance from
the diagonal means nothing.
The three shapes, and the test behind each
These are groupings this page applies to the data. Each is a
rule about what the API returned , none of them names a cause.
Whole thread went , 0 comments in 0 occasions.
The rule: the thread stopped being returned, and every reply in it that was checked
individually also came back empty.
One account, across more than one thread , 4 comments in
1 occasions. The rule: every comment this tracker ever saw from that author
came back empty, and those comments sat in more than one thread. It is a rule about the
set, not about timing , an account whose comments went on separate occasions draws
more than one dot.
No shared pattern , 6 comments in 3 occasions.
Everything neither rule matched. 0% of it (0
comments) is accounts this tracker has only ever seen once, so there is no set for the
second rule to test. The rest belongs to 3 accounts that do have a
set, which did not span two threads.
Precedence: 0 comments meet both of the
first two rules and are counted under the account shape. 1 accounts and
0 threads meet the rules.
Other measurements, and what each one counts
Measurement
What it counts
Value
Comments by Professor Dave Explains, confirmed gone
posted by the channel that owns the video, asked for by id, came
back empty
0
of those, inside a wiped thread
the first rule above also matched the thread they sat in
0
Comments by Professor Dave Explains, flagged but still answering
stopped appearing in the listing, still returned when asked for
by id
0
Author still visible , wiped threads
removed replies whose author is tracked elsewhere on this video,
share of those with that author still visible
0%
Author still visible , mixed threads
same measure, in threads where some checked replies came back and
some did not
0%
Largest wiped thread
replies in it, distinct accounts among them, and how many of those
accounts still comment elsewhere on this video
0 / 0 / 0
Counts, not conclusions. What they add up to is left to the
reader , read the limits below before drawing one.
What cannot be known from this data
Who. Self-deletion, channel-owner removal and YouTube policy removal give
the same empty response. The API never names an actor.
Whether an account-shaped disappearance is the account or the channel. An
account being removed and the channel owner hiding that user both take every comment at
once and answer the API identically.
Anything about a removal from the survival of its replies. Replies surviving
means only that nothing acted on the replies. An owner removal that does not cascade
looks the same as a self-deletion, and for the thread shape survival is how the group
was defined , so reading a cause off it is circular.
Whether it is permanent. A comment held for review answers the same way and
can come back later. "Gone from the API" is what is measured; "deleted" is an inference.
The exact moment. See the note under the chart.
Anything that happened before this tracker started. It began watching part
way through the video's life, so 8 of the 10 confirmed removals are
comments that were already there when it arrived. For those, "how long it lasted" has no
answer , only a floor , and any comment removed before the tracker started was never
seen at all. Removal rates for the earliest posting days are therefore floors too, and
the low rates there are as easily an artefact of arriving late as a real difference.
Second chart as numbers , comments, by the day the removal
was spotted. All 10, both cohorts.
Day spotted
Whole thread
One account
No pattern
Total
2026-10-04
0
4
6
10
Where the gap comes from. The tracker marks a comment deleted
when it stops showing up in the listing, and never confirms it. This job re-checks every
flag against the API individually and caches the answer, so a confirmed removal is only
paid for once. Latest run, 1 API calls:
threads, nothing flagged.
Individual removals, all 10 confirmed gone.
Replies under a removed thread, nothing flagged.
The flags are matching the API this run, so the two totals are close.
Bucket
Rule the code applies
Comments
How sure
Top level comments removed
thread stopped being returned by the API
0
solid
Replies under those comments
reply in a removed thread, same timestamp
0
solid
Account wipes and bans
same account, 3+ removals, one minute, 2+ threads
4
likely
Spam filter, copy paste
identical text removed 2 or more times
0
likely
Creator or channel mods
removals in creator threads above the base rate
0
estimate
Everything else
no rule above matched
6
estimate
What a separate action means. Comments removed from one account
within the same minute are counted once, however many there were. So 5 is
how many times something acted, not how many comments it cost. The bottom two rows of the
table are estimates rather than counts: the API does not report who removed a comment, so
they are derived from account and content patterns. The creator row comes from removals
appearing in threads Professor Dave Explains posted in more often than the base rate, and is zero when there
is no such gap.
All trackers4 videos watched by this service. Each has its own page, its own history and its own numbers.
Destiny Loves GenocideProfessor Dave Explains972 creator comments12,887 comments gone (7,542 confirmed)15,062 threads trackedupdated 04 Oct 2026, 20:39
This is What Bad Faith Debate Looks Like (Destiny Israel Fact Check)Professor Dave Explains19 creator comments10 comments gone (10 confirmed)2,022 threads trackedupdated 04 Oct 2026, 20:52
you are here
Why are the creator’s replies all at the same indent?
The API stores replies flat: every reply’s parent is the top-level comment, with
no record of which reply it answered. The only clue is the @handle
prefix YouTube used to insert on a reply-to-a-reply, and it is almost never there any
more. On this video 19 of 19 creator replies carry no prefix. Without it there is
nothing to match against, so those replies sit against the top-level comment rather
than guessing at a target. Open a collapsed run to read what was actually
being answered.
